pextenlug

"A lot of people are using linen fabric because of the fabric being light. Rajiv adds, "It is important to think about the space that you are decorating. But, if one is not a fan of big changes, people can always make minor changes by introducing the use of various colours in soft furnishing. Is it light or dark, small or big? For a small, dark space, you probably wouldn’t use dark hues that can make the space seem even smaller and wouldn’t reflect any light unless you are specifically aiming to create that mood.The role of individual biases, especially when it comes to colour preferences, is considered with equal emphasis.Whether we are aware of it or not, colours have the capacity to impact our mood and influence our physical and mental well-being. Rajiv explains, "In bespoke furnishings, it depends on taste or theme of the house. Colours can reveal a lot about one.. Green and blue are often associated with a calm atmosphere, while yellow brings joy and happiness.

"When it comes to homes, selecting colours becomes even more crucial as they set the mood of a place.The colours that we choose to surround ourselves with, in our homes, play a larger role in influencing Sanitaryware Suppliers our mood and feelings than we think. so choose well." Apart from playing a major role in other aspects of the interior, colour and lighting is equally important when it comes to choosing curtains, cushion and wall prints. Different colours have different wavelengths and, therefore, they affect the endocrine system and consequently our mood and stress levels in different ways.Even a miniscule change in furnishing can have a prominent effect on one’s life." he concludes. A nicely styled sheer curtain is preferred by a lot of people these days. Along with that window blinds are preferred as they are easy to use and easy on the space. So, It is really important how you play with colours here," Rajiv Kanwar, co-founder , Win-dow Passions expresses.Explaining the science behind this, Jyoti shares, "Light is made of colours, and when it strikes our retina, it converts into electrical impulses that pass onto the hypothalamus, which in turn affects our hormones. "Soft furnishings are used differently in environments depending on their functional requirements. Jyoti Sobti, a psychologist, explains that research in neuroscience and psychology has shown the effect that colour has on our brain and our hormones, and, therefore, can affect our mood, behaviour and physiology."Similarly, if the house is modern it should have subtle hints of bespoke designs like modern borders on window blinds so set them apart from basic blinds," he continues.This tendency of the human brain to associate colour with emotion depends on the cultural context, however, colour psychology is quite universal (minus personal biases).

 So, the colours that we surround ourselves with on a daily basis can influence how we feel, express, and live. Therefore, the choice of colour in our homes is important. For instance, red symbolises passion, anger, power and energy; violet, on the other hand, represents creativity and spirituality. So how should one choose soft furnishing? When it comes to deciding for these, fabric is an important component. If it’s a classical house it is advisable to incorporate classical themes on furnishings such as borders on the curtains similar to the cushions"

California Superior Court Judge Brad Seligman, who oversaw the trial, told jurors in February that the company was no longer part of the case after it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection under the weight of the talc litigation, which stayed lawsuits against it.Oakland: A California jury on Wednesday awarded USD 29 million to a woman who said that asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s talcum-powder-based products caused her cancer.Leavitt’s trial originally included J&J’s talc supplier, Imerys Talc America, a unit of Imerys SE, as a co-defendant.Jurors found that J&J’s talc-based products used by Leavitt were defective and that the company had failed to warn consumers of the health risks, awarding .

The verdict, in California Superior Court in Oakland, marks the latest defeat for the healthcare conglomerate facing more than 13,000 talc-related lawsuits in America. J&J won three other cases and another five ended in hung juries."Leavitt’s was the first talc case to go to trial since Reuters on Dec..While earlier talc lawsuits alleged talc itself causes ovarian cancer, plaintiffs’ lawyers have more recently focused on arguing asbestos contamination in talc caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, a form of cancer linked to asbestos exposure. The jury declined to award punitive damages.The lawsuit was brought by Terry Leavitt, who said she used Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower - another powder containing talc sold by J&J in the past - in the 1960s and 1970s and was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2017. "The internal J&J documents that the jury saw, once more laid bare the shocking truth of decades of cover-up, deception and concealment Shower Chairs Suppliers by J&J. The nine-week trial began on Jan.The New Brunswick, New Jersey-based company denied that its talc causes cancer, saying numerous studies and tests by regulators worldwide have shown that its talc is safe and asbestos-free.69 billion in a July 2018 multi-plaintiff ovarian cancer verdict.J&J said it would appeal, citing "serious procedural and evidentiary errors" in the course of the trial, saying lawyers for the woman had fundamentally failed to show its baby powder contains asbestos.4 million in damages to Leavitt and her husband.

The jury deliberated for two days before delivering its verdict, which was broadcast online by Courtroom View Network. 7 and included testimony from nearly a dozen experts on both sides. 14 published a report detailing that J&J knew that the talc in its raw and finished powders sometimes tested positive for small amounts of asbestos from the 1970s into the early 2000s - test results it did not disclose to regulators or consumers.In 11 cases so far alleging asbestos contamination in talc, three have resulted in wins for plaintiffs, awarding damages as high as USD 4. The company did not provide further details of the alleged errors during the trial."Yet another jury has rejected J&J’s misleading claims that its talc was free of asbestos," said Moshe Maimon, a lawyer for Leavitt, in a statement on Wednesday. It was the first of more than a dozen J&J talc cases scheduled for trial in 2019.J&J has appealed all of the plaintiff verdicts, and the company said it is confident the verdicts would be overturned on appeal."We respect the legal process and reiterate that jury verdicts are not medical, scientific or regulatory conclusions about a product," J&J said in a statement on Wednesday

California Superior Court Judge Brad Seligman, who oversaw the trial, told jurors in February that the company was no longer part of the case after it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection under the weight of the talc litigation, which stayed lawsuits against it.Oakland: A California jury on Wednesday awarded USD 29 million to a woman who said that asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s talcum-powder-based products caused her cancer.Leavitt’s trial originally included J&J’s talc supplier, Imerys Talc America, a unit of Imerys SE, as a co-defendant.Jurors found that J&J’s talc-based products used by Leavitt were defective and that the company had failed to warn consumers of the health risks, awarding .

The verdict, in California Superior Court in Oakland, marks the latest defeat for the healthcare conglomerate facing more than 13,000 talc-related lawsuits in America. J&J won three other cases and another five ended in hung juries."Leavitt’s was the first talc case to go to trial since Reuters on Dec..While earlier talc lawsuits alleged talc itself causes ovarian cancer, plaintiffs’ lawyers have more recently focused on arguing asbestos contamination in talc caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, a form of cancer linked to asbestos exposure. The jury declined to award punitive damages.The lawsuit was brought by Terry Leavitt, who said she used Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower - another powder containing talc sold by J&J in the past - in the 1960s and 1970s and was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2017. "The internal J&J documents that the jury saw, once more laid bare the shocking truth of decades of cover-up, deception and concealment Shower Chairs Suppliers by J&J. The nine-week trial began on Jan.The New Brunswick, New Jersey-based company denied that its talc causes cancer, saying numerous studies and tests by regulators worldwide have shown that its talc is safe and asbestos-free.69 billion in a July 2018 multi-plaintiff ovarian cancer verdict.J&J said it would appeal, citing "serious procedural and evidentiary errors" in the course of the trial, saying lawyers for the woman had fundamentally failed to show its baby powder contains asbestos.4 million in damages to Leavitt and her husband.

The jury deliberated for two days before delivering its verdict, which was broadcast online by Courtroom View Network. 7 and included testimony from nearly a dozen experts on both sides. 14 published a report detailing that J&J knew that the talc in its raw and finished powders sometimes tested positive for small amounts of asbestos from the 1970s into the early 2000s - test results it did not disclose to regulators or consumers.In 11 cases so far alleging asbestos contamination in talc, three have resulted in wins for plaintiffs, awarding damages as high as USD 4. The company did not provide further details of the alleged errors during the trial."Yet another jury has rejected J&J’s misleading claims that its talc was free of asbestos," said Moshe Maimon, a lawyer for Leavitt, in a statement on Wednesday. It was the first of more than a dozen J&J talc cases scheduled for trial in 2019.J&J has appealed all of the plaintiff verdicts, and the company said it is confident the verdicts would be overturned on appeal."We respect the legal process and reiterate that jury verdicts are not medical, scientific or regulatory conclusions about a product," J&J said in a statement on Wednesday

Mira Rajput and Shahid KapoorJLo even posted a video of herself piggybacked on A-Rod as the latter did push-ups. Going to the gym together can save time and is extremely motivational. Kareena Kapoor Khan and Saif Ali Khan were also spotted leaving the gym together recently. Sometimes when you are too lazy to go to the gym, your partner is a motivation. You’re 70 per cent more likely to achieve your results if you work out with your partner.". Only the strength varies because of the hormones. Couples can also do many leg exercises, push-ups and pull-ups. They can follow the same exercises — what men can do, women can do too," adds Ismail. Vinod Channa, who is known for transforming Anant Ambani, explains, "Instead of dumbbells, you can carry your partner.

"However, fitness expert Dinaz Vervatwala cautions that the requirements for men and women can be quite different. Celebrity fitness trainer Kunal Gir reveals, "It’s a fantastic idea to exercise together and I motivate my clients to do the same. "Kickboxing, abs workout, functional training and weight training exercises can be done by couples. The concentration will be divided if you follow the same routine."Victoria and David BeckhamConcurring Shower Curtain Rods Manufacturers with Dinaz, fitness trainer, Batul Khan, adds, "It’s a good idea, but the exercise routines can be different. They can probably run, swim and walk together. On the other hand, Beyoncé and Jay-Z made exercising together fun as they wore matching workout gear. I have trained several couples who workout together.Whether it’s eating dinner together or refusing to go to bed angry, couples do several things to make their relationships stronger. She explains that while couples can go to the gym together, they should train separately.

For instance, if a man can do squats with 100 kilos, a woman may do it with just 40 kilos. Celebrity couples such as Mira Rajput and Shahid Kapoor, Beyoncé and Jay-Z, Jennifer Lopez and Alex Rodriguez, Bipasha Basu and Karan Singh Grover, Samantha Ruth Prabhu and Naga Chaitanya, Will Smith and Jada Pinkett and Victoria and David Beckham, among several others are known to exercise together. Studies have also shown that couples who work out together tend to have healthier and happier relationships. A lot of men carry women while exercising.JLo and A-Rod recently shared this fun picture on social media. This is because the trainer won’t be able to concentrate on one person.What’s more, according to experts, working out together can be healthier than snuggling together! Just like JLo and A-Rod, one can use their partner as a substitute for weights."Ismail Mustafa, who has trained many well-known filmstars, says that when couples exercise together, they motivate each other. Dinaz adds, "Men and women have different requirements as their bodies are different. The bones and muscles are the same for men and women so the exercises can remain the same. So they can undergo personal training. It has become a trend and a lot of videos of couples exercising together are going viral